Comments on: electronic voice phenomena

By: Dave

Dave — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:48:47 +0000

It's more that if there's no compelling empirical evidence for ghosts, then there's no ghosts. And there's no evidence.

Pretty much it, really.

By: Thenybo

Thenybo — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:42:49 +0000

but Wee-jee seems funnier.

By: sullust.org » Blog Archive » A Modest Proposal

sullust.org » Blog Archive » A Modest Proposal — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:05:27 +0000

[...] today believe we can test a witch by seeing if she floats. Instead we now understand that ghosts talk to us through the static on our televisions. In short, we have [...]

By: TamyrlinInk

TamyrlinInk — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:49:18 +0000

I'm silently sceptical about all mysticism, paranatural activity and supernormal occurances. That way, if it doesn't exist, I can say I knew all along, and if I'm wrong and it does exist, no-one will ever know.

Though sometimes I wonder what it is like to go on a rant explaining to people why they're wrong and why ghosts don't exist. I bet it feels good.

By: davidovkosovo

davidovkosovo — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:36:04 +0000

this comic benefits greatly from the comics section. i wish more webcomics worked this way…

By: Rachel

Rachel — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:05:07 +0000

Ouija

Like oui and ja.

By: TwistofCain

TwistofCain — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:11:05 +0000

But still only using 2%!!!!

By: TwistofCain

TwistofCain — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:10:07 +0000

Quija*

Maybe?

By: frostyplum

frostyplum — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:29:19 +0000

there's no rational reason I should be laughing at that ghost this damn hard

By: SassaFrassa

SassaFrassa — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:16:16 +0000

Maybe it's some kind of… cricket TV.